_(cropped1).jpeg)
Europe is preparing to move part of its asylum system beyond its own borders. New EU rules, agreed by the Parliament and member states in June, clear the way for so-called return hubs — facilities in non-EU countries where people who have exhausted their right to stay can be sent while their removal is arranged.
It is one of the most consequential shifts in European migration policy in a decade, and it turns an idea once confined to the political fringe into the bloc's official position.
On 17 June, the European Parliament approved tougher migration rules that allow return hubs to be set up in third countries for people with a final return decision. Such hubs would only be permitted in states that sign agreements committing them to international human-rights standards, including the principle of non-refoulement — the ban on sending people back to danger.
At a hub, authorities would verify identity, obtain travel documents and detain those who resist or are judged a flight risk. The end point is either deportation to a person's home country or transfer to another "safe third country." The rules also make return orders mutually recognised across the bloc by July 2027, and — most controversially — leave open the possibility of sending unaccompanied minors to third countries that can prove they will protect them.
The momentum has come from two capitals. Italy pioneered the model with its protocol to process migrants in Albania, and Denmark has spent years arguing for asylum claims to be handled outside Europe. Nineteen EU governments — including Austria, Belgium, Greece, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden — signed a joint letter backing the approach. Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis has said the goal is to conclude the first agreements in 2026, with hubs operational from 2027.
The Financial Times reported that Frederiksen expects EU-funded deportation centres outside the bloc could be operating as soon as next year, as governments across Europe harden their stance amid the continued rise of far-right parties.
Rights groups are already lining up to challenge it. Lawyers and organisations such as the European Council on Refugees and Exiles warn the scheme strains the principle of non-refoulement, access to fair procedures and judicial oversight under both EU and international law. Denmark has gone further than most, signalling it is willing to test the limits of the European Convention on Human Rights. Critics fear the hubs could leave people in indefinite limbo in countries with weak legal protections.
Offshoring asylum is no longer a thought experiment; it is written into EU law, with a 2027 start date. The bottleneck now is diplomatic — the EU still needs third countries willing to host the hubs, and on terms its own courts will accept. Expect a wave of legal challenges, and expect migration to keep dominating the politics of the bloc as governments race to show voters they have regained control of their borders.
